In one of my political science classes, political science was defined as the field studying how decisions are made. Indeed, Wikipedia’s definition is very close to that. I’ve been a ’serious’ student of music–in the listening sense–since I was maybe thirteen or fourteen; before that I mostly just listened to what was on the radio, and what my parents listened to. This, my first comment, has led me to write this post, and the topic here was one of the chief motivating factors behind getting a blog for my position.
To introduce my credentials, I began as an assistant librarian for KUOI in the fall semester of 2005, about a year and nine months ago. Becky Dawson was the music director at the time, and we had French 101 together. After a few weeks on the job, after having been trained as a DJ, I was asked if I’d like to do a show. A few people who were planning on doing the 2-6 AM slot Saturday mornings had decided they couldn’t do it after all, and Arlie Sommer, then station manager, asked if I’d like to do it every other weekend (as a gentleman had volunteered to do it only that often). I agreed. November of that year saw the station’s 60th anniversary, and I became friends with, among others, Sam Butterfield, a DJ from 1946, and Tim Cavanaugh, the 6-8:30 PM Friday DJ and a former station manager. Tim was moving on to music director at KRFP, Free Radio Moscow, and encouraged me to apply for his slot in the spring. I got it, and I’ve done that slot ever since–three semesters and having just begun my second summer. I continued as a music librarian until last semester, after which I was asked to do this job.
This sounds like a non sequitur, but it will tie in. In Germany, as Professor Sandra Reineke explained one day in PolS 235, former politicians often join college faculties. Their political affiliations are well-known and not attempt is made at hiding or absolving oneself of them. It’s seen, according to Prof. Reineke, as experience and expertise. In America that wouldn’t fly, because allegations of bias and this and that would all come in. The Supreme Court offers another interesting example. The Daily Show, in their book America: The Book, put it nicely, and I’m paraphrasing, by supposing a president asks himself (herself) “How can I be sure that this nominee will only ever make decisions I agree with?”
Ultimately I serve at the pleasure of Andy Jacobson, station manager, my boss. I believe, though I’m not certain on this point, that he has unilateral hiring and firing power over KUOI staff. I don’t know the doctrinal ins and outs of university policy and how Idaho’s right to work status might affect things, but. Andy likes Bright Eyes; until their last album I was not a fan. I’m also not hot for Joanna Newsom, or Iron and Wine, and I’m kind of sick of Sufjan Stevens. There, I said it. But shall I keep my views hidden? Should I refuse to comment on anything I don’t like?
Part of my job, the way I see it, is as a gatekeeper to new music, deciding which shall go on the new music shelf and which shall not. This is perhaps the most fundamental part of my job, and maybe the one most open to criticism. Who am I to say this album’s not worth it and this one is? Well, I’m the music director, and you’re not. If I pass on an album and someone asks about it, I’ll let them review it and I’ll put it out. Some of my predecessors would not do the same. I’ll note that it hasn’t come up yet. Iron and Wine, Sufjan Stevens, Joanna Newsom–these acts are such known quantities and have so many supporters that I wouldn’t pass on an album from any of them, even if I thought it was really, really awful. Maybe that’s regrettable. In a way it’s exactly contrary to what college radio is meant to be about, and we’re just like our maligned Clear Channel brethren in doing that: supporting a band because they’re already famous, not because the music’s any good. Why would I put an awful Iron and Wine album out, if I would pass on it if it were by any other name? Well, my DJs would demand it. It would chart at CMJ, and its promoter would call me and demand it. People might listen to our friends at KZUU across the state line instead of KUOI. Is this right or wrong or is it neither?
I don’t think I should hide my preferences. I don’t think I should hide the contrary either. Though we got the Dixie Chicks’s new album, I haven’t seen any Toby Keith come in. Nor have I seen Kelly Clarkson come in. But Travis did come in, and Nine Inch Nails came in, and Yellowcard, as mentioned, came in. I listened to the Travis CD and gave it a positive review, because I liked the album. I reviewed it, in part, because I was asked about it by a promoter. Nine Inch Nails I felt qualified to review (having listened to a decent amount of NIN in my years here on earth) but I did not review. I put a label on it, wrote down which songs have profanity, and put it on the shelf. It hasn’t been played yet. Yellowcard I only received yesterday, but I haven’t listened to it. I’ve heard Yellowcard, but I can’t stand it. I don’t like Yellowcard, I don’t like Underoath, I don’t like Saves the Day, I don’t like Thursday… I could go on. It’s not a genre I feel qualified to review, and to a point I don’t think the genre has anything going for it. But shall I try to find something good to say about everything that comes in, and put things out indiscriminately? Some CDs that come to the station have awful production, worse lyrics, and even worse art. My mission is to KUOI and to its DJs. If I don’t feel that I’m helping one or the other I’ll pass on the album.
There’s another question here, about the objective vs. the subjective. I don’t believe one can objectively review music. This is not a controversial stance. There is no innate barometer, no God-given metric, no universal agreement on what is good and what is not. My old roommate Stu thought The Sex Pistols were meritless, but still buys Weezer albums when they come out. This is but one example. I cannot say I categorically hate what I broadly call “emo.” I like some Reggie and the Full Effect tracks, I sang along to “Screaming Infidelities” a couple times, and I have fun at every hardcore show I go to. But… I suppose… a lot of it sounds alike to me. I beg pardon. I cannot pretend to like it, and I would do everyone a disservice if I did. But it leaves me with little option besides trying each CD in the genre out, and passing on it when I find I don’t enjoy listening to it. I strive in my work to find something good about a song or an album, and if I come up empty-handed, well, that’s all I can do.
The second part that comes in is how to promote an album. Everyone says they like all kinds of music, but I spend time with jazz, with classical, with rock, with hip-hop, with rap, with pop (too much time with pop), with experimental, with funk. Nearly all of these genres can be found in albums I’ve put out. Some genres–twee pop, indie rock–might be overrepresented e.g. in my Album Preview choices. But how else to decide? Quotas? A committee? The power is vested in me, and an objective review of the music is, again, impossible. I’m just as excited about great jazz as I am about great indie rock. Right now, KUOI doesn’t have a mission statement. I try my best to know music (reading music news, listening to everything that comes in, spending quality time with everything I own, buying LPs and CDs and reading music blogs often) and I know what I like. Though I like some metal, the 11-2 Monday night DJ, Trevor, does a metal show. He may be more ‘qualified’ to review metal, and he’s volunteered to review for me. Same situation with world music and two DJs at the station, same situation with folk/country and Friday morning DJ Preston. Right now I don’t know of any DJs who play emo. That’s the regrettable truth. As I look through music that’s been passed on by other music directors I see a lot of Smithsonian Folkways and Putumayo discs that I think are fine, or good, or great. I add them to the library when I can.
One solution to this problem, if it is a problem, is more transparency. I’m writing on this blog about the decisions I make, and I invite anyone who cares to to second-guess my decisions against albums. More on these topics later, when I sober up. No, I’m kidding. But I will write more if more occurs to me.